Wednesday, September 19, 2012

A Celebration

""But if today is really in honor of a hundred children murdered in war," he said, "is today a day for a thrilling show?' 'The answer is yes, on one condition, that we, the celbrants, are working consciously and tirelessly to reduce the stupidity and viciousness of ourselves and of mankind.'" (Vonnegut, Cat's Cradle, 225) Ambassador Horlick Minton speaks these words less than an hour before San Lorenzo's icy downfall. When I read this paragraph I stopped, wrote 'fascinating' in the margins, and dog-eared it so I would remember to blog about it. The idea is an optimistic one: we can always celebrate as long as we are simultaneously making progress. Yet it is also a pessimistic one: we can never celebrate unless we are putting all of energy into benefiting society, into becoming better people than we were one second ago. That is tiring. We spoke in class about "dynamic tension", how in order to have one extreme we must have the other, and the question becomes whether anything in the middle really exists. One way to read this novel would be to say that Vonnegut constantly suggests that mankind is stupid and not capable of looking out for themselves. But another reading exists too. The people of San Lorenzo devote their entire lives to trying to be happy, trying to spin lies upon lies so that the fragile happiness does not break and instead becomes a tighter web. However, when are we allowed to stop and celebrate that which we already have? Is there ever a time we can throw up our hands and say, we have issues but we're trying, enough for today! Because if you are always happy would you even know you were happy? Would happiness even exist? The characters in Cat's Cradle tend to believe in extremes, but I believe that the balance between two ends is generally what we seek, and we must constantly take moments to stop, balance ourselves, and celebrate what we have already done, as well as what is to come.

2 comments:

  1. When I was reading the section on the celebration, I too thought it fascinating, though a little ridiculous. Why celebrate the death of one hundred people who died in vain, who never even got the opportunity to fight for their beliefs? And it is even more absurd that the plane show at this silly celebration would ultimately cause the apocalypse. To me this celebration is just another example of Vonnegut poking fun at mankind's stupidity.

    ReplyDelete
  2. To me, Vonnegut's idea of dramatic tension between two extremes illustrates his thought that human beings never look for the middle ground. I think with both San Lorenzo and the ideas of science and religion he believe we will always push toward one end of the spectrum or the other and never enter the middle ground unless we have to. My main evidence of this is the island of San Lorenzo. The two people who wanted to save San Lorenzo, McCabe and Bokonon, never actually tried to fix the island and only instituted lies to comfort its population. Nowhere does it talk about them trying to grow industry or attempt to make the lives of their people any better in conventional matters. It seems like they left teh obvious choice out of teh equation.

    ReplyDelete