Vonnegut argues that religion and
science are both needed to maintain “dynamic tension” in the world. He uses the image of the child’s game cat’s
cradle to illustrate this concept. In
class we talked a lot about the word “tension” and how vital it is to keep the strings
tight to keep the game alive (and the world together). But for me, the key word is “dynamic.”
To play cat’s cradle, there needs
to be two hands. Continuing the
parallel, there needs to be both science and religion to create balance in our
world. Science is often associated with the truth (and most
people take it to be true), and according to Vonnegut, religion is harmless
lies. In cat’s cradle, since each hand
relies on the other, that then suggests that truth depends on lies, and vice
versa. This creates a paradox. How can a truth be based on a lie and still
be true? For the other side, if we lie
about the truth, what is the point of knowing the truth in the first place?
This leads to the question of what
it means to find the truth. Vonnegut
writes a book that starts with declaring itself untrue, and then tells a story
about Hoenikker—a man who dedicates his life to the truth. What does this say about the quest for truth? That it is not only unnecessary, but also
futile. After all, if we are going to
lie to ourselves about the truth eventually anyway, why know it? Because we have to have something on which to
base our lies. There’s the paradox.
This is why “dynamic” is the key
word. What is true and what false is not
clearly defined, and our fleeting definitions are always changing. The tension comes naturally when we have two
such opposing forces. As Jonah puts it,
“life [becomes] a work of art” (175) as we as individuals create our own
realities to cope with the dynamic uncertainty.
I really like the parallel of the two hands holding dynamic tension to science and religion holding tension in our world. I think Vonnegut argues that the truths about one or the other and not as important as we think they are and rather what is more important is the idea that life cannot be sustained with just religion or just science. That goes back to the point that what's true and what is a lie doesn't necessarily matter as long as what we believe in is consistent and "fulfills" our lives.
ReplyDelete