The two minor characters Norman
Bowker in Things They Carried and Newt Hoenikker in Cat’s Cradle show
how traumatic experiences can inhibit one’s ability to move forward. Both of
these characters dwelling on several keys events in their lives and seem to
move in circles instead of progressing forward and moving on. Norman Bowker
plays a mostly minor role in the war stories, but is focused on in “Speaking of
Courage” and “Notes,” which portray Tim’s telling of Bowker’s struggle to cope
with his experience in Vietnam upon returning home. Bowker struggles with the
town feeling “remote somehow” and reflects on times when “there had been no
war” as he drives in circles around the lake of his hometown (O’Brien, 133;
132). Bowker is caught between the innocent memories of his hometown before the
war and his traumatized self post-war. The struggles that Bowker faces are the
very similar to Tim the writer. However, unlike Bowker, Tim copes with his
confusion by writing. Similarly to how Bowker imagines a long conversation with
his dad, Tim reaches out to the reader by writing down his stories from war
because he is unable to move past his memories from Vietnam any other way. Similarly,
Newt Hoenikker in Cat’s Cradle seems to be stuck moving in a circle
around his own dysfunctional relationship with his father. Newt makes it clear
that his main memory from the day the atomic bomb dropped was how terrifying
his father was as he attempted to play cat’s cradle with him. He says, “So
close up, my father was the ugliest things I had ever seen. I dream about it
all the time” (Vonnegut, 12). Newt never seems to recover from this dramatic event
in his childhood. When he later explains the absurdity of the game to the
narrator, it becomes clear that Newt is unable to move on from his relationship
with his father even after his death. These minor characters show how repetition
of memories dreams create an internal tension that directly impacts their
ability to cope with their present.
I also noticed the inability of Newt and Bowker to cope with the difficulties in their respective worlds. I think their inability to cope serves as a good counter example to O'Brien and the Bokononists, who are able to heal and find happiness through the strategic use of lies. This suggest that the power of lying and stories become essential find explanations in our difficult world.
ReplyDeleteI think that it is not that the two cannot cope, but that people do not give them the opportunity to. In Bowker's case all he wants is somebody to talk to and no one, except a worker at a fast food joint, wants to hear about it. He has nobody to turn to. Newt is constantly undermined by his sister who is terribly insensitive to the affect his dwarfism has on him. She treats him as if he was in grade school not an adult. I believe that if both these characters had had the opportunity to cope they would have and, if not move past their problems, at least deal with them effectively.
ReplyDelete