While Tim O’Brien’s
The Things They Carried is considered a novel about the Vietnam War, its story most resonant in my mind is not one of battle, but of childhood love and
loss. In the novel’s final chapter, “The Lives of the Dead,” O’Brien inserts
into his collection of war stories a seemingly random account of nine-year-old Timmy's infatuation with a classmate named Linda, who died of cancer just months after their innocent love sparked. Ostensibly unrelated, this story serves to
emphasize the purpose of O’Brien’s metatextual commentary – to comment on the
act of storytelling and the necessity of manipulation to truly tell a story in the most dynamic way – more effectively, in my opinion, than any of the novel’s
individual war stories. At the time of his writing of this story, Linda was
long deceased – but in this chapter, O’Brien suggests that in act of writing,
he can bring her back to life: “In a story I can steal her soul. I can revive,
at least briefly, that which is absolute and unchanging. In a story, miracles
can happen” (224). The purpose of this chapter, it seems, is to settle the
truth-versus-lies debate that permeates the entire novel once and for all. In implying that the purpose of storytelling is to bring life to the
lifeless, O’Brien refutes the notion that truth has any importance. He himself
admits that he has manipulated his anecdote to represent the image of Linda in
his memory, not the image of Linda in reality, but this illusory manipulation
creates, he claims, an even more vivid image of aliveness: “The thing about a
story is that you dream it as you tell it, hoping that others might then dream
along with you, and in this way memory and imagination and language combine to
make spirits in your head. There is the illusion of aliveness” (218). Evidently, this ostensibly
unrelated anecdote of bringing his dead childhood love back to life turns out
to be crucial in summing up a main point of contest in the entire novel – the purpose of storytelling and the necessity of lies within it – abundantly clear: if a story’s true power is to bring a three-dimensional sense
of life through two-dimensional words on a page, a certain level of
manipulation is not merely welcome, but required.
I thought the purpose of this story was to also exemplify how a war story does not have to be about war. Yes, the story of Linda justifies his creation of lies rather than telling the truth, but it also illustrates the fact that war stories are not about war, they're about anger and love and all sorts of other emotions and actions beside war. Basically, O'Brien uses a completely unrelated story to sum up the two major points of his novel, which, if you think about it, is pretty genius.
ReplyDelete