When I was
little, I thought the ability to travel in time would be great. I could relive
the best moments of my own history, travel into the distant past to the time of
the Egyptians, or jump forward into the future to find flying cars and a world
controlled by robots. This desire, however, somewhat changed as I grew older
and thought more about the confines of time and the complications that come
with messing with it. Time is one of the few linear systems in our world and
its simplicity brings humans great comfort. It is consistent; it will always go
on at the same rate. When humans break this linear sequence of time, the safety
is gone, forcing us to face a multitude of new problems, which are almost
always misunderstood. What becomes reality if people disobey the confines of
time by traveling through it? Can history be rewritten? Can history, the one
thing that can be written in stone, be meddled with, distorted, changed? These
questions stretch our minds and only leave us with more unknowns. In Kindred, Dana cannot make sense of these
paradoxes, she simply must accept and move on in order to survive. Although the
consequences of her actions in the past may be inconsequential, she must treat
history as a pliable entity, she must think of every single decision as one
that might influence something in the future. Dana must constantly make sure
not to dramatically alter the future while she is living in the past, only
adding stress and worry to her situation. Dana’s difficulty controlling the
consequences of time travel only exhibits its downsides and the great unknowns
of a non-linear time system. I don’t think we can ever understand time beyond
its natural form. Though our minds wonder with the possibilities of time travel
and the intrigue of the paradoxes of time, I think we are much better off
living linearly. In a world where few things are certain, the clock’s reliable ticking
is an undervalued virtue of life.
No comments:
Post a Comment