After reading both novels, I found profound similarity between the two conclusions. Both embody the idea that stories have the
power to “make things present.”
Vonnegut lists things he “would”
have done “If [he] were a younger man.”
Although the immediate effect and perception I have is one of regret,
all of the actions he lists are ones that his characters or he himself have
done. For example, he writes, “I would
climb to the top of Mount McCabe,” which Jonah, the narrator, did. He says, “I would take from the ground some
of the blue-white poison that makes statutes of men; and I would make a statue
of myself.” Just a few pages earlier,
Jonah came across Bokonon who did just that.
At the beginning of the paragraph Vonnegut writes, “I would write a
history of human stupidity,” which he (Vonnegut and Jonah) did. Because of this statement, the “I” becomes
more ambiguous. Did Vonnegut write Jonah
to be himself? Furthermore, Vonnegut
made up Bokononism. Vonnegut is
technically the author of the Books of Bokonon, thus also equivocating himself
with Bokonon. Bokonon made a statue of
himself from blue powder, and Jonah said he would have made one of
himself. Now all three of them are
connected. By making readers identify
him with his characters, Vonnegut essentially puts himself in the book, which
is impossible because in the book the world ended; yet here we all are, in the present.
O’Brien’s conclusion is more
obvious in its connection to the present: it is written in the present
tense. He says, “I’m young and happy,”
describing his current state. Also, like
Vonnegut, O’Brien draws himself closer to his character O’Brien when he says “Tim
trying to save Timmy’s life with a story.”
This statement describes what O’Brien the author is currently trying to
do, in part, with the novel, and his other writings in general. Through his writing, O’Brien brings people to
life in words, telling a story that makes himself and readers feel deeply, so
much that those they read about come alive and feel present. Through his ability
to make himself believe certain “foma” through stories, O’Brien demonstrates
the power stories have to redefine what it means to be present. It doesn’t only apply to what is physically
visible. Being present can mean being in
someone’s thoughts, or even evoking emotion from words on a page.
*All Vonnegut quotes are from page 287; all O’Brien quotes
are from page 233.
*Thanks Professor Schwartz for helping synthesize my idea.
No comments:
Post a Comment