Concerning Cat’s Cradle in this argument, Bokonon is defined as the religious
leader. The possibility that he is a construct is not addressed in this context
as he is analyzed as an independent character. Bokonon and McCabe’s original
reason for Bokonon going into hiding was to “give the religious life of the
people more zest, more tang” (Vonnegut 173). This may be viewed as distastefully
manipulative. Bokonon does not necessarily need to give the religion more
excitement to keep the followers interested, but he chooses to do so possibly
for the simple thrill of observing his followers fall into his trap, but does
this act supersede Bokonon’s good
intentions? Does Dobbins’ selfishness supersede his?
Wednesday, October 2, 2013
Religious Intent
The
argument that the religious leaders in both Cat’s
Cradle and The Things They Carried seek
to lead their followers to happiness and ease of mind has validity, however it
may be argued that noble intent is overshadowed by a more selfish motivation in
both novels. In The Things They Carried,
the primary religious figure is defined in this argument as Henry Dobbins.
Although Kiowa is more devoutly and outwardly religious, Dobbins actually
considers leading organized religion.
While he considers this, he states (in addition to remarks concerning visiting
the ill and being kind to people) that he would enjoy a “Free house, free car. Lots
of potlucks” (O’Brien 114). This may be viewed as a very selfish act as Dobbins
expresses interest in the life of a minister to experience the benefits of the
position rather than solely to help his congregation.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment