Truth cannot be
constructed through a human’s perception of another person. The truth only
exists in the heart and mind of the individual. This concept is important when
looking at Kurt Vonnegut’s Cat’s Cradle
and trying to figure out what is true and what is not. Between pages 1 and 187,
the narrator tries to paint a picture of Mr. Hoenikker’s identity. The narrator
accomplishes this through his children and the people that worked alongside
him. They used words like genius, father, and creator of the Atomic Bomb. These
words or phrases went into describing who Mr. Hoenikker was, but at the same
time, they painted a picture of him that was false. He certainly was a genius,
having created many different patents; he also was a father, having three
children; and he did create the Atomic Bomb. However, to himself, Mr. Hoenikker
was none of these things, which directly contradicts identity that was place
upon him. In actuality he was a child trapped in a man’s body. The proof is in
the things he surrounded himself with: children’s toys. The idea that he plays
with toys does not make him a child trapped in a man’s body, it is what these
toys represent. Toys, in the perspective of Mr. Hoenikker, were a sign of his
everlasting innocence, something he was trying to hold on to. The day the
Atomic Bomb was dropped he was playing with string; the mindset of a child
clinging to the little bit of innocence he had left. Deep down, Mr. Hoenikker
hated what he had created. American citizens may have loved him, but in other
countries he was the evil which children are told about at night. All he had
were his toys to remind him that he was just an innocent, little boy. Everyone
else saw him as a genius, a father, the creator of the Atomic Bomb, and in rare
cases, and a monster. How Mr. Hoenikker
is shown in the book is nothing more than a fictional person created through
others perception of him.
I think that this is an interesting point to bring up because I think that it also makes a commentary on how other people's perceptions of us do carry some weight. We construct an image of ourselves (the truth) and other people are left to interpret our personalities however they see fit. But are they liars for seeing us in a certain light?
ReplyDeleteI don't think they can be labeled as liars, for they are simply reporting their truth. My truth is not necessarily your truth, or his or hers. In reality, how do we determine what is in fact the truth? Is it even possible? I think we'd all like to think it is.
ReplyDeleteI also picked up on the innocence of Felix. I think Vonnegut uses the innocence of Felix to display how scientific innovation has lost its connection with morality. Although humans posses the minds to create spectacular, yet destructive devices, they lack the moral responsibility and maturity to actually understand the impact of their creations.
ReplyDelete