For a while before taking this class I'd been a bit cynical
about the various sources of manipulation in my life. It’s been fun to talk and think about this
more throughout the semester, especially with respect to literature, which I
haven’t thought about before. I found
myself worrying a little about all the manipulation, but found comfort in the
realization that the best and perhaps only way to rise above the manipulation
is simply to acknowledge it.
I remember one of the first days of class we talked about
which news sources we thought were most unbiased. Most people would tend to think CNN is
probably the most unbiased, reliable source, and would discount The Colbert
Report and The Daily Show as merely comedy sketches. However, I think it’s pretty impossible for
something to be entirely unbiased. The
bias in CNN reporting could be so subtle we can’t even perceive it, which means
we are unknowingly being tricked into agreeing with them. Colbert and Stewart present bias that is so
obvious, so transparent, that, in a way, we can see the issues for what they
really are. The bias is so easy to peel
away with these shows, making them perhaps a better way than CNN to react to
the news in your own way, without being influenced by the way in which it is
presented. Once you know you are being
tricked, you can see the situation more clearly.
I think this class, in a way, operates much like the Colbert
Report, with my other classes being more CNN or NPR-esque. It was so blatantly stated from the first day
of class that we would be manipulated, but also that it was exactly the point
of the class. Much as the Colbert Report
challenges viewers not to trust traditional media, this class encouraged us –
through the transparent manipulation in this class – to examine the ways in
which we are manipulated by other authority figures in our lives.
I think your analogy of this class operating like the Colbert Report and our other classes more like the operations of CNN or NPR is perfect. I know I am being manipulated in Lit, so I choose to examine everything I am told more. In my other classes, such as my public speaking course, I take everything the professor says to heart even though it may not always be true. We learned that using personal stories always engages the audience and saying "um" and "uh" detracts from what the speaker is trying to say. While I respect the time my professor put into studying this material, is it really possible to come up with a formula for a good speech? Sometimes the audience may not want to hear a story and saying "um" may make the speaker seem more human and relatable to the audience.
ReplyDelete