As I
had a fair amount of free time over this vacation, I naturally spent the vast
majority of it reading comic books and watching movies. Although nothing can
ruin either of these things for me, the further I get into the subcultures of
both, the more I am noticing some disturbing trends of manipulation and
labeling. It comes as no surprise that the movie industry is full of
manipulation: everything from the clips and music in the trailers to the
pictures on the posters is designed to generate interest. But that’s not the
extent of the manipulation. A fair amount comes not from the industry, but from
the subculture. As a “movie buff,” I have noticed that it is almost impossible
to avoid the question “so what’s your favorite movie?” when talking to anyone
else with an interest in movies or film. For a long time, I would skirt the
question whenever asked because I like Kurosawa and Bergman and others in that
same vein, but I was worried that people would either think I was a pretentious
or a snob. There is a pervasive compartmentalization in the movie subculture
that separates people based on “type” and then uses that as a basis for competition.
For example, if you consider yourself a fan of action movies because you really
liked Terminator II: Judgment Day,
someone will challenge that claim because you haven’t seen the whole series, or
know enough of the backstory, or know who the director is, or have watched the
director’s entire filmography. This isn’t the case with every “movie buff,” but
it is a persistent and pervasive problem. People manipulate one another into a
competition of identity where you can’t claim to like Bruce Lee unless you can
name all the different martial arts he studied. This problem is even worse in
the comic book subculture, although the newness of comic books as “mainstream
media” and the relative impenetrability of said subculture make the problem
less visible.
So-called
“nerd culture” is on the rise nowadays. There is an increasing preponderance of
movies based on comic books, video games are starting to leave their stigmas
behind, and appreciation for science is flourishing. But unfortunately, this
doesn’t correspond with an increase in openness or a willingness to welcome
newcomers. If anything, people have gotten more defensive, egotistical, and
competitive about their likes now that they are starting to become popular: if
you liked the movie Watchmen, then it
means nothing if you didn’t read the comic first and if you only read the comic
because you liked the movie, then that still doesn’t count. If you have only
played Braid and Portal, then you’re not really a “gamer.” There are countless
other examples of this defensive competition, but comics are particularly
afflicted. First of all, there is still the assumption that a fan of comic
books is a fan of superhero comic
books. And if that assumption is made, then it opens up a whole new subculture
with its own snobbishness. If you don’t know how many times Jean Grey (Phoenix)
has died and come back to life, or how Modern Batman is different from the New
52 Batman, then you’re not a true fan of comics. And again, I run into the same
problem of being worried what my label will be for liking comics like Tank Girl, Transmetropolitan, Fun Home and
anything by Paul Pope. All industry manipulation aside, there is still
manipulation at work in the subcultures of movies and comics. We're being told that we have to defend our likes and interests, and by extension, our identities. We're being told that you can "win" at liking something. It is manipulation
that doubts the genuineness of one’s enjoyment based on the perception of insufficient
or inferior knowledge and pigeon-holes people based on their interests. In the
end, this need to compete is completely useless. One’s likes cannot be used in
a quantifiable way; there is no hierarchy of fandom and no prize for “liking
something better” than someone else. There is no sense in a competition of
identity.
This is pretty spot on. Mirrors a lot of ideas that I read once in this article written in response to some guy who was pissed about the increasing popularity of Comic-Cons. I really wish I could find it. Anyways, the author also went on to compare and contrast nerds and hipsters. His explanation was something like "hipsters aren't excited to meet someone who knows the obscure things they do, while nerds are."
ReplyDelete