Wednesday, October 2, 2013

Religious Intent

                 The argument that the religious leaders in both Cat’s Cradle and The Things They Carried seek to lead their followers to happiness and ease of mind has validity, however it may be argued that noble intent is overshadowed by a more selfish motivation in both novels. In The Things They Carried, the primary religious figure is defined in this argument as Henry Dobbins. Although Kiowa is more devoutly and outwardly religious, Dobbins actually considers leading organized religion. While he considers this, he states (in addition to remarks concerning visiting the ill and being kind to people) that he would enjoy a “Free house, free car. Lots of potlucks” (O’Brien 114). This may be viewed as a very selfish act as Dobbins expresses interest in the life of a minister to experience the benefits of the position rather than solely to help his congregation.
Concerning Cat’s Cradle in this argument, Bokonon is defined as the religious leader. The possibility that he is a construct is not addressed in this context as he is analyzed as an independent character. Bokonon and McCabe’s original reason for Bokonon going into hiding was to “give the religious life of the people more zest, more tang” (Vonnegut 173). This may be viewed as distastefully manipulative. Bokonon does not necessarily need to give the religion more excitement to keep the followers interested, but he chooses to do so possibly for the simple thrill of observing his followers fall into his trap, but does this act supersede Bokonon’s good intentions? Does Dobbins’ selfishness supersede his? 

No comments:

Post a Comment