Wednesday, September 12, 2012

The Real Mr. Hoenikker


Truth cannot be constructed through a human’s perception of another person. The truth only exists in the heart and mind of the individual. This concept is important when looking at Kurt Vonnegut’s Cat’s Cradle and trying to figure out what is true and what is not. Between pages 1 and 187, the narrator tries to paint a picture of Mr. Hoenikker’s identity. The narrator accomplishes this through his children and the people that worked alongside him. They used words like genius, father, and creator of the Atomic Bomb. These words or phrases went into describing who Mr. Hoenikker was, but at the same time, they painted a picture of him that was false. He certainly was a genius, having created many different patents; he also was a father, having three children; and he did create the Atomic Bomb. However, to himself, Mr. Hoenikker was none of these things, which directly contradicts identity that was place upon him. In actuality he was a child trapped in a man’s body. The proof is in the things he surrounded himself with: children’s toys. The idea that he plays with toys does not make him a child trapped in a man’s body, it is what these toys represent. Toys, in the perspective of Mr. Hoenikker, were a sign of his everlasting innocence, something he was trying to hold on to. The day the Atomic Bomb was dropped he was playing with string; the mindset of a child clinging to the little bit of innocence he had left. Deep down, Mr. Hoenikker hated what he had created. American citizens may have loved him, but in other countries he was the evil which children are told about at night. All he had were his toys to remind him that he was just an innocent, little boy. Everyone else saw him as a genius, a father, the creator of the Atomic Bomb, and in rare cases, and a monster.  How Mr. Hoenikker is shown in the book is nothing more than a fictional person created through others perception of him. 

3 comments:

  1. I think that this is an interesting point to bring up because I think that it also makes a commentary on how other people's perceptions of us do carry some weight. We construct an image of ourselves (the truth) and other people are left to interpret our personalities however they see fit. But are they liars for seeing us in a certain light?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I don't think they can be labeled as liars, for they are simply reporting their truth. My truth is not necessarily your truth, or his or hers. In reality, how do we determine what is in fact the truth? Is it even possible? I think we'd all like to think it is.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I also picked up on the innocence of Felix. I think Vonnegut uses the innocence of Felix to display how scientific innovation has lost its connection with morality. Although humans posses the minds to create spectacular, yet destructive devices, they lack the moral responsibility and maturity to actually understand the impact of their creations.

    ReplyDelete