Is
the development of events that are to come beyond an individual's control? Can
a twist of fate come into play and prevent that which is destined to happen
from occurring, or is fate truly inevitable? Such questions are addressed in
"An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge."
Farquhar
is introduced to the reader as he is hanging on a platform, awaiting his
inevitable death. Yet through what appears to be a twist of fate, Farquhar is suddenly
given a chance to save himself. This opportunity provides the reader with a
sense of hope. It is this belief in optimism that convinces the reader that
Farquhar will be able to avoid his own fate that seemed to be so
inescapable. As Farquhar slips into the water below, barely steers clear
of the gunshots aimed at him, stumbles onto land, and begins his journey home,
the reader is alongside him and feels sincere emotion. The sympathy for Farquhar
that Bierce creates by depicting his humanity leads the reader to hope that
this twist of fate might very well exist. The reader has been fully drawn into
the illusion of his escape, which has now become the reality.
Just
as the man finally seems to have eluded his treacherous fate, both Farquhar and
the reader are faced with the harsh reality: there is no escape. So this
brings us back to the question, “Is fate escapable?” It is said that some
things are simply meant to be. If such is true, why do we develop a sense of
hope that something may happen otherwise? We build up a feeling of security
once we feel that we have managed to slip away from fate, yet if things are
destined to be, then they will occur regardless. Can a permanent twist of fate
actually exist, or is it simply a temporary sense of misguided hope that lures
us away from our inevitable destiny?
Bierce includes the hope of survival to manipulate the reader into believing that Farquhar is actually going to survive. Why wouldn't we believe the author, especially when he is sharing with us something we want to hear?
ReplyDelete