Kurt Vonnegut and
Tim O’Brien, writing about thirty years apart from one another, both write
novels that claim to have no meaning. In fact, both works explicitly inform the
reader that the contents inside the novel are untrue. But upon further
examination and analysis of each novel, the reader finds an important message
in both books, if not many. After reading both of these novels, I found myself thinking about the concept of evil,
and how it seems that both authors portray the fact that human beings are the constructors of
the evil present in the world. People often associate evil with malicious
intent, but in both novels, evil is portrayed in a different way. In regard to Cat’s
Cradle, atombomb creator Felix Hoenikker’s indifference,
unawareness of surroundings, and investment in his own life, to support the
claim that lacking the moral capacity to care about other people is a huge
concern in terms of technological advancement. Thus, because humans create
technology, there is a serious danger in technological advancement, and
subsequent human survival; it seems as though science’s invention of the atomic
bomb could support the claim that science has little interest in humanity’s survival.
In addition, for The Things They Carried, Kiowa’s
recurring death in several different chapters to emphasize the fact that there
is a highly unneccessary component of wastelessness and carelessness that goes
along with war. Also, in the chapter "The Man I Killed," O'Brien the narrator repeats himself numerous times regarding the physical appearance of the dead man, but he also invents a story of the man's life, making O'Brien seem even more guilty but also somewhat evil, in that he acted in a profoundly immoral and malevolent way.
I agree with you that humans are a source of evil, though I believe every human has some kind of moral capacity. We have just been desensitized as a culture, and we lack empathy for those around us. I think what you said about Felix Hoenikker's indifference towards society is a perfect representation of this. I found this clip http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=msfu8YCCc8Q which demonstrates human's brutality and lack of empathy towards one another. This desensitization may be largely because of the media and video games.
ReplyDeleteWhat I find truly fascinating though, is how even in the desensitized society we live in, where people constantly text during dinner instead of talk to the person right next to them, or where children practice killing people on their video games without a second thought, we can still be so moved by a piece of writing. O'Brien is able to manipulate his readers to feel empathy and feel pain for his characters, who aren't even real. How can we use this wonderful (though in some ways evil) manipulation to make people feel empathy towards not only characters in a fictional novel, but towards one another in real life? Can O'Brien's writing teach us how to find our moral compasses?
I am interested in your observation on the nature of science. While many of us think of scientists as those attempting to cure cancer or benefit mankind in some way, we forget that there is a whole other side of science involving war and finding the best way to kill people. Vonnegut does indeed bring this to light, which makes me wonder if he is pointing a finger at the nature of science, or if he is simply emphasizing the presence of evil in all aspects of human life- even those that seem most valuable,
ReplyDelete