Throughout
Foe, the true story and its author are unclear. As readers, we don’t
know who owns the story; we don’t even know what the actual story is. Does it
belong to Susan Barton and her time on the island? Or does it belong to Daniel
Foe and his desire to write about a woman in search of her long lost daughter?
Or does it belong to Friday and his silence? I don’t think I will ever know the
answers to these questions and I believe this is exactly what Coetzee’s
intentions were. The only thing I can be sure of is that Foe started
with Barton’s discovery of Friday and it ends with the anonymous narrator’s
discovery of Friday. On page 154 he/she says of Friday, “From his mouth without
a breath, issue the sounds of the island (154). This speaks to the silent power
that Friday possesses throughout the entirety of the novel. As much as Barton
and Foe disagree about what the content of Barton’s story should be, they both
desperately want to hear Friday’s story, and make it a part of their own
stories.
But
despite all of Friday’s influence, I still don’t think that Foe is
really his story. After all, only “the
sounds of the island” came from his mouth—not his time in enslavement or his
time with Barton in England. On pages 156 and 157 the narrator uses flowy,
almost ethereal imagery to describe what he sees in the cabin. He/she describes
“petals floating,” a “rain of snowflakes” and limbs that “float like stars.”
There is nothing concrete or sure about these descriptions, just like there is
nothing concrete or sure about the “real” story and its author. We go along
reading the novel in confusion about what story and whose story are meant to be
told, and Part IV is no exception. All we can be sure about is that Friday is
an essential part of everyone’s stories, and the true story's—whatever that may
be.
It's interesting that Friday is the center of all the characters' stories. He seems so essential but intangible. A metaphor for silence, Friday, represents the presence of silence in storytelling. The ending, however, was inconclusive in my opinion. The narrator heard what they wanted to hear from Friday and not his story. It seems like no one's story is fully told in the novel. We get pieces from different narrators, but nothing full with a tangible beginning and end. I'm not sure what Cotezee's intention was, but if he was trying to depict the oppression felt by South Africans through storytelling he certainly captured their voicelessness.
ReplyDelete