When I first started reading it, Aura seemed straightforward
enough. Sure, it’s a little bizarre to read a non-children’s book written in
the second person, but hey, every author has his own style. I should have
known.
The
elephant in the room of the literary oddities in the story is Aura herself. At
first, she apparently cannot speak for herself; she is a silent character. Of
course, it becomes apparent later that she is a construction of Senora
Consuelo’s younger self, but even still, I think she draws a lot of parallels
to Friday. The bond between Consuelo and her construction is very similar to
the bond between Susan and Friday in that Susan projects herself on the
manservant. Though she does not tell her own story, she makes up a story for
Friday, and as such, their lives become intermingled to the point of no return.
At the end of Aura, Felipe agrees to enter the world of Consuelo and her
projection. At the end of Foe, the reader, and arguably Susan herself, are
dragged into the world of Friday, the world of silence and paper constructs.
Aura is
ultimately a construct of Carlos Fuentes, and it is her silence, just like
Friday’s, that drags the reader into the story world and leaves him guessing.
Felipe ends up becoming the general, just as Friday ends up becoming the storyteller
at the end of Foe. The two stories are not told from their perspectives, but
Friday and Aura are the constructs that ultimately give them their meanings.
No comments:
Post a Comment