When I read An Occurrence on Owl Creek Bridge, I never questioned that the
events taking place might not actually be happening. But looking back on it,
why wouldn’t I question it? Why would I think the rope miraculously breaking
would be a plausible event to take place? But, in the world of fiction anything
can happen, anything is possible, especially for the protagonist. The main
character can make an extraordinary escape, or survive a fall from a hundred
foot drop, or dodge every bullet the bad guy shoots no matter how close in
range they are. They can do anything. I expect
them to do the impossible. I expect that they will somehow have managed to
cling onto a branch after falling off the side of a cliff. I expect that the
bullet that hit them didn’t kill them—of course it only got lodged in the small
book they happened to have in their front pocket. There was some false security
I had in the protagonist that they at
least wouldn’t die, even if other important characters around them did. But, Bierce
manipulated that little universal truth that I clung to.
A few months ago I read the final
book in a trilogy (I won’t name it… spoilers?) and it defied my expectations
regarding how a series “should” end. The female protagonist—the main character—died. She was shot three
times while saving the day. Despite my initial shock, I wasn’t heartbroken
because in the back of my mind I thought: “she’s still alive, she’s injured and
almost dead, but she’ll survive”. Because that’s what the main character does
in the works of fiction… even if she’s been shot three times. No matter what
happens to them somehow they survive.
So I kept reading, waiting for the moment when she miraculously returned from
the “dead”. She lay in a hospital bed and the male protagonist sat next to her
obviously heartbroken. And I knew the moment was coming: he would take her hand,
beg her to survive, and she would wake up. But she never did.
I was furious. I felt like the
author had somehow betrayed me. It was some unwritten law, some unspoken truth
that the protagonist—the hero, the main character—survives. That was the hope
and the lie I clung to.
I suppose after reading the
above-mentioned book I should have realized that my universal truth about
protagonists was a lie, a little manipulation I was meant to find security in.
But Bierce fooled me again. Reading An
Occurrence on Owl Creek Bridge I never doubted that Farquhar’s noose had
snapped, that he managed to free his hands from their ties despite being
underwater, that every bullet shot at him missed, and that he walked all day
through woods he didn’t know despite literally having been hanged earlier that
day. I didn’t doubt it because it seemed possible for the protagonist.
Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me
twice, shame on me. Hopefully I’ll learn that I can’t always trust my
expectations.
After reading the line about fictional books, I totally agreed with what you have to say about fictional books. The main character is almost always assumed to survive, and usually ends with a happy ending. However, as we know so far, this class is about lies and how the narrator/writer are able to manipulate readers into thinking one way just by the way they write. Narrators/writers, literally have full control of how the plot will flow, which they use to their advantage to trick readers. Without this attribute, all books would be similar and surprises would just not be as exciting!
ReplyDelete