Tuesday, March 3, 2015

Chris McCandless and Timothy Treadwell

The documentary Grizzly Man reminds me of the novel Into The Wild by John Krakauer. Not only do both of these works revolve around a wilderness plot, but both main characters display similar characteristics.  Chris McCandless drastically differs with Treadwell prior to his excursions, but amidst his wild adventures McCandless demonstrates very similar qualities to Treadwell.  McCandless denied any assistance or money from others because he believed he could overcome the wild without such objects.  I feel as though this correlates to how Treadwell refused to listen to people about his safety, and how he felt obliged to “protect” grizzly bears even though they appear to be fine on their own.  Both main characters exhibit a salutary neglect of the dangers they expose themselves to and neither valued money.  Chris McCandless donated his $25,000 college fund while Treadwell refused payment for his lectures on grizzly bears.  Also, both McCandless and Treadwell both meet their fate through following their passions.  McCandless was believed to have perished from eating a poisonous plant, but now we are finding that he actually died from starvation.  Treadwell ultimately died from a grizzly bear attack, which he seems to expect was coming from a hyper aggressive bear.  Both of these stories have numerous correlations other than just the superficial wilderness plot.  However, Treadwell’s story adapts into a hollywood story while McCandless found no fame until after his death.  This gives Treadwell’s story a manipulative feel to it.  The different perspectives of Treadwell provided by his acquaintances seem to seek the audience’s approval rather than telling his actual story.  Also, Treadwell begins to make his story with the thought of a national audience in his mind, which also contributes to the feel of seeking the audience’s approval.  Ultimately, Treadwell’s story does not seem genuine while McCandless’ story does.

2 comments:

  1. I really like the comparison of these two pieces, as they definitely are very similar stories in some ways. It is interesting that you bring up authenticity. My personal feeling is that both were very authentic. Their refusal to accept handouts from the public, and their utter devotion to their respective passions seems quite authentic to me. I find though, that you make a good point about Treadwell's story. His was ready for hollywood adaptation from the beginning, while McCandless' story needs his death in order to grab audiences. I think that in the end, each person's lifestyle was really about themselves. They each faced inner demons, and they both died while fighting them.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I like how you compare Chris McCandless and Timothy Treadwell. (Probably because I love Into The Wild so much and any mention of it makes me illogically happy). I found it interesting how you decided that Treadwell's story does not seem as genuine as McCandless's, because Treadwell seems to be appealing to an audience and trying to prove something to someone (society? himself?). I know there was a lot of controversy in the outing community over Chris McCandless after the book came out and people started idolizing him. To a lot of people, he was idiotic and selfish. He left society, did not tell anyone where he was going, isolated himself and put himself in danger. Andrew Jillings, when I interviewed him in the Fall in my Adventure Writing class, said McCandless, "had a right to do what he was doing but he was an idiot. He did not take proper care of himself, he did not read enough, he did not know the situation enough, he was not rational enough about his desires and he paid the price. Fortunately, to his credit, he did not kill else doing it. There was no rescue party. No one else risked their life trying to save him. He made some really fundamental errors that he should have known better about."

    ReplyDelete